Article Tags

“USG Referendum”

A new week. A new USG-related brouhaha. The Prince breathlessly reported this morning that the USG had failed to follow through with a recently passed referendum—that all USG members publicly declare whether they’ve signed a pledge to never solicit recommendations from University administrators. If the Prince comments are any indication, a handful of students have gotten pretty vitriolic about making sure USG members are prohibited from asking administrators for references because of a possible “conflict of interest.”

I understand the spirit behind the pledge—that USG members shouldn’t be unethical. But it’s unclear to me why getting a recommendation from an administrator has become the flashpoint over ethics and why asking for a recommendation should even be considered unethical. [Full disclosure: I'm the U-Council Chair on the USG.]

Continue reading…

engaging_200Princeton students have voted to donate both the Fall 2009 Lawnparties main act and USG Senate Pilot Program funds to “Student-initiated service projects” over not donating the money at all or donating the funds to Annual Giving. At least, that’s according to a PDF released by the USG earlier today.

The catch, however, is that the document only shows first place votes – the actual vote will be tabulated by single transferable ballot (basically, everyone ranks their choices 1 through 3, and the people who voted the least popular item first have their second choice counted instead.) Pretty much, it doesn’t look like anything will change from these results, but if it does the USG will have once again found a way to bungle an election.

We go inside the numbers and break down how the vote happened after the jump.

Continue reading…