Article Tags

“physics”

 

While shopping period has already come to an end, it’s still never too early to take a look at the course evaluations from last semester and start planning for the fall (okay, perhaps it’s a bit too early). Luckily, if you were basing your class decisions on our post from last year, not much has changed with the latest batch of course evaluations.

The Highest Rated Department:

East Asian Studies once again, garnering an average score of 4.55 for the quality of its courses.

Lowest Rated Departments:

Physics (3.33) has now dropped below Economics (3.46) to take the spot of lowest rated department in terms of average course quality. Also joining them in the bottom three is Civil and Environmental Engineering (3.46). 

Student Happiness by Department:

Humanities students are still the happiest, with most humanities departments garnering scores over 4.00, resulting in an overall average of 4.18. On the other hand, only one natural science department (Molecular Biology) had above a 4.00. But B.S.E. students seem to be happier than a few years ago, with the department coming in second for the quality of their courses at 3.82.

Some classes to avoid?

CHM 305: The Quantum World (rated a dismal 1.82)
EGR 191: Integrated Introduction to EMP: Math (2.16)
PHY 101: Introductory Physics (2.72)

On the other hand, small seminar classes fared well, most notably:

HIS 448: History: An Introduction to the Discipline (a perfect 5.0)
CLA 336 / LIN 336: Introduction to Indo-European (4.85).
DAN 209: Introduction to Movement and Dance (4.93)
CWR 201: Creative Writing Poetry (4.73).

As one enthusiastic student wrote about CWR 201, “Absolutely take it. The world will open up and speak to you, and you’ll learn how to tell others about it. Poetry is life.”

This week: the birth of our nation and the validation of our physics. And a couple things of lesser gravity, too, like this picture of John Nash and Tina Fey chatting on Cannon Green.

Still unclear as to why Nash is on the set -- could be a cool cameo, maybe.

Still unclear as to why our favorite game theorist is on the set -- could be a nice cameo, though. (image courtesy of the University's Facebook account)

Continue reading…

Top of the agenda this past week: a really, really smart person says gravity is an “illusion” and LeBron James’s Princeton grad dad emerges from the mist. Wait, what?

Renowned babies scholar

Renowned babies scholar

First off: we pay our respects to Norman Ryder, a revolutionary Princeton sociologist who passed away at the age of 86. Ryder pioneered the “cohort” approach to demographic study, which analyzes a group of people of the same age as they “go through life and share similar experiences,” sort of like that movie about babies.

Speaking of babies, Ryder did a lot of massively influential research on fertility. He and another Princeton professor, Charles Westoff, co-directed the National Fertility Studies in ’65, ’70, and ’75, interviewing thousands of American women and eventually demonstrating, among other cool things, “that a drop in unplanned births accounted for nearly the entire decline in U.S. fertility following the post-World War II baby boom.”

And speaking of unplanned births …

This past week, LeBron James, one of the best humans to have ever touched a basketball, decided where he was going to bounce and shoot that basketball for the foreseeable future. For those who managed (somehow) to miss it, it was a big deal. The national media salivated, tongues lolling dumbly, as Mr. James managed to scientifically pinpoint himself as the center of the known universe (I don’t want to talk about it here it will get ugly I’m going to stop right now). It was a spectacle – and in the midst of it all a strange 55-year-old man decided to smack LeBron with a lawsuit, claiming to be his father and accusing his “son” of a fraudulent cover-up.

Is LeBron LeSon?

Is he really LeDaddy?

You may be wondering why I am talking about this. The fact is …

Continue reading…