Article Tags

“Course Offerings”

If the weeklong break wasn’t enough to ease the pain of the last exam period, it might be worth taking another look at your course schedule for the coming semester. Shopping period starts tomorrow, which means it’s time to make good on that resolution to pick classes that will be just as interesting in May as they sound right now.

Easier said than done, but with the help of the registrar’s course evaluation results, you just might unearth a few of the intellectually fulfilling courses you imagined finding here – or at least avoid the universally despised.

Course satisfaction by department

graph by Nathan Serota '14

Humanities students had the highest overall satisfaction with the quality of their courses, rating them 4.1/5, while engineering and natural sciences students tied for the lowest course satisfaction at 3.7.

Among the departments, humanistic studies and East Asian studies grabbed top ratings at 4.5 and 4.4, respectively.  Neuroscience and linguistics students were the least happy with their classes, at 3.1 and 3.2, which goes to show that the outlook for the engineers and natural science students, whose departments rank solidly in the middle of the pack, isn’t so bleak after all.

If you do find your department trailing behind the happy-go-lucky humanities division, you can still avoid the lowest-rated classes.  ORF 245: Fundamentals of Engineering Statistics, and ORF 311: Optimization under Uncertainty tied for the dubious honor of least satisfying course, at 2.3.  WWS 300: Democracy was close behind at 2.4, followed by LIN 201: Introduction to Language & Linguistics with 2.5.

At the other end of the spectrum, there were several classes scoring a perfect 5 (including quite a few Woody Woo seminars, perhaps to make up for the required Democracy class).

Happy shopping! (?)

Screen shot 2010-03-31 at 2.12.02 PM

Ice, ice, baby - where were you freshman year?

You know when you’re picking classes and you found the perfect SA and an English class that looks awesome and you’re really excited, and then it turns out they’re at the same time? Or when you spend five hours trying to decide between ECO 101 and ECO 100? (Don’t do it if you don’t have to.)

Well it looks like Gyeong-Sik Choi ‘10 is looking out for you, because he’s created the new Integrated Course Engine. Or ICE.

Besides having a sweet name, the searchable engine takes all the classes you’re thinking of signing up for, compiles reviews from the Student Course Guide and course descriptions in different panes, and lays them out for you in a neat little schedule.

Bam. Course-picking just got a little easier.

(image via Michael Yaroshefsky’s email to USG News subscribers)

source: backstreets.com

source: backstreets.com

By now it’s obvious that Princeton professors have a big old crush on Bruce Springsteen.  First there was this fall’s course on the sociological implications of the Boss.  Next up: AMS401: At Home in New Jersey, a spring seminar that promises to investigate Bruce’s first studio album Greetings From Asbury Park “at a more sophisticated and advanced level.”

But elsewhere, (less sophisticated?) Bruce-watchers seem to have grown weary of the Jersey Shore troubadour.  Hipster collective Pitchfork Media gave Springsteen’s latest  effort, Working on a Dream, a lackluster 5.8 out of 10 and called the track Queen of the Supermarket Maybe the worst thing he’s ever written.” (Ouch.)  They also named the album’s cover art the absolute Worst of 2009.  (Ouch again.  Also: true.)

So who wins–Indies or Eggheads?

Continue reading…

Machines: Winning the War on Paper

Machines: Winning the War on Paper

Course offerings came out last week, and something felt different.

Fall break at home has roughly the same effect on my brain as high-caliber Novocaine, so the course guide had my full attention as soon as the website was up. I had never gone on the website first – it was always the place I went after I had my initial list of courses, gleaned from flipping through the thin, pulpy sheets of the paper course booklet. But how different could it really be?

Really, really different. I was completely overwhelmed. I tried looking at only one department at a time, but even then I was just staring at a list of numbers and course titles. Sure, more information was only a click away. But something about the process seemed too active – I was not browsing, I was power searching.

Why I care (and you should too!) after the jump.

Continue reading…