Article Tags

“controversy”

Just like last week, allow us to provide you with this week’s best/most provocative/quirkiest in the world of Princeton-related social media. In other words, here’s a way  to catch up on what you’ve missed, join in the debates, or (most likely?) relive this week’s procrastination material.

Res college listservs

On lost things:

Screen shot 2012-03-04 at 2.34.30 PM

Prince comments

On the controversial mention of the women’s crew team in In Defense of: Blacking Out:

Screen shot 2012-03-04 at 10.38.09 AMOn the debate over Beyond Annual Giving:

Screen shot 2012-03-04 at 4.15.48 PM

And, constructively:

Screen shot 2012-03-04 at 12.18.30 PM

Princeton FMLs

Gastro hangs on…

Screen shot 2012-03-04 at 10.34.16 AM

Continue reading…

With a vote count of 1014 to 699, the Princeton undergraduate student body voted down a referendum asking for the University to provide alternatives to Sabra hummus on campus shelves, Undergraduate Student Government President Mike Yaroshefsky ’12 said in an email this afternoon.

The referendum, introduced last week by the Princeton Committee on Palestine, had faced some stumbling blocks between the initial petition and the official referendum. They sought the referendum due to allegations that the Strauss Group, co-owners of Sabra Hummus, were providing aid to an Israeli defense force that has allegedly committed human rights violations.

This story is developing, so we’ll let you know more as soon as we can.

… she’s baaaaack.

Although I suppose she was never quite here to begin with — last time was sort of messy. Regardless, human rights advocate Nonie Darwish will be speaking at Princeton this Wednesday, March 24th at 4:30 in Whig Hall Senate Chamber. The event, titled “Human, Minority, and Women’s Rights Under Islamic Law,” is sponsored by Whig-Clio, The Tory, and The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA)– and it’s bound to spark some campus controversy, given her (short) track record here.

Why the sudden change in heart? According to Whig-Clio:

Our policy on Ms. Darwish’s visit to campus is the same as it was last semester: so long as another campus group is willing to sign off on the legitimacy of Ms. Darwish’s beliefs, Whig-Clio is happy to throw its full institutional support and resources behind her visit. As such, when Tigers for Israel revoked its invitation last semester, Whig-Clio followed suit. Now that the Tory is willing to sponsor the event, Whig-Clio is more than willing to sign on.

In a joint press release, both groups noted that equally controversial speakers have been invited in the past, and that Darwish’s views by no means reflect their own. It’s fair to say that she’ll receive a less-than-warm welcome from many students, but the sponsors hope that those “who disagree with Darwish’s views will participate constructively in the event by asking thoughtful questions during the Q&A period following the lecture.”

We haven’t seen a Whig-Clio event this heated since, well, yeah. This should be interesting.

Before today, the only time I’ve given much thought to the whole “boo-hoo Princeton toilet paper sucks” controversy was when I was deciding who not to vote for during USG elections.

But then I stumbled upon this 1930 ad for Scott Toilet Tissue (click the picture to enlarge):

4322687998_579a35b5ac_o

Continue reading…

Well, writes, actually – about being disinvited from Princeton.  Read it here.

An excerpt:

I understand why Jewish groups disinvited me after Muslim pressure, since they are the ones who must live daily with Muslim groups who can make life unpleasant….

By stifling free speech, shaming speakers of the truth and calling them names, we allow tyranny to win. Fear tactics has worked for centuries in the Muslim world; now it is spreading like cancer in U.S. institutions of higher learning.